All About Grants at NIH

How to Find Help

NIH Family Friendly Policies

To Resubmit or Not Resubmit

Early Stage Investigators (Part 1): Policy 

Early Stage Investigators (Part 2): Extensions 

Basic Experimental Studies with Humans (BESH)

In this NIH All About Grants podcast episode, we virtually sit down with Diane Dean, a senior advisor within the NIH’s Office of Extramural Research, and dive into what you should know about financial conflicts of interest (FCOIs). The conversation touches on the regulations and our Guide Notice NOT-OD-21-002, what investigators and recipient institutions should do to comply, how NIH oversees the process, what may happen if these rules are not followed, and who to contact with questions. “Remember that…Significant Financial Interests, whether they're foreign or domestic, if they're related to your institutional responsibilities, they must be disclosed… transparency and accountability ensure that research is objective and in the best interest of the public.” – Diane Dean

All About Grants Podcast – Financial Conflicts of Interest

The NIH Loan Repayment Program (LRP) conversation is back! And, building on Part 1, this time, we are getting into the nitty gritty of the application itself. Dr. Ericka Boone, Director of the Division of Loan Repayment is joined by Dr. Roya Kalantari, a program officer focused on LRPs at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to discuss what you should do when preparing to apply, the various sections of the application, some tips to consider and mistakes to avoid, as well as thoughts on when seeking a renewal. “Ingrain those [evaluation criteria] in your brain as you're writing this application and make sure you're directly addressing each of those concepts…It is sort of this idea of you holistically as a researcher, it's not just your project. It's how is this project going to help you achieve your research goals? What is the appropriateness of your previous training? Does it align with what you're proposing to do now?” – Roya Kalantari. Please do not forget to check out the LRP page for eligibility and program information, send questions to LRP@NIH.gov, and follow them at #NIH_LRP.

Loan Repayment Programs (Part 2) – The Application

Did you know that NIH can actually help pay off some of your educational debt? Up to $50,000 worth over two years in fact! Now that we have your attention, join us for this first in a two part NIH All About Grants podcast mini-series on the NIH Loan Repayment Programs (LRPs). Dr. Ericka Boone, Director of the Division of Loan Repayment within the NIH Office of Extramural Research, discusses the different extramural LRPs available, what exactly is “qualified educational debt” (and, importantly, what it is not), considerations for applying, benefits to participating, and much more. In our second conversation (coming soon), we will dive deeper into the specifics of developing your application. Please also check out the LRP page for eligibility and program information, send questions to LRP@NIH.gov, and follow them at #NIH_LRP.

NIH Loan Repayment Programs – An Overview

You’ve seen the guide notice and read the reissued parent conference grant funding opportunity announcement, noting Diversity Plans are now required and will be considered during the review of your application. Maybe you’ve even taken some time to peruse the conference grant webpage and read this Open Mike blog… Sometimes it’s helpful to hear it all explained. In this NIH All About Grants episode, Dr. Paula Goodwin with the NIH Office of Extramural Research discusses the Diversity Plan, why it is required for conference grant applications, some things to consider when putting a plan together, how reviewers will assess it, and more.

Diversity Plans for Conference Applications

Thanks to a suggestion from a listener, in this NIH All About Grants episode a duo of NIH program officers, Drs. Lillian Kuo from the National Cancer Institute and Kentner Singleton from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, share their advice and experience on developing a research plan for a grant application. They discuss the relationship between the specific aims and research strategy, provide suggestions for when you sit down to start writing, and share common pitfalls. More helpful advice on writing your application is available from the NIH Grants and Funding site. Have an idea for a future podcast? Email ExtramuralNexus@mail.nih.gov and tell us all about it. We appreciate the feedback!

Considerations for Developing a Research Plan

So you have confirmed that you are doing human subjects’ research after listening to the first podcast in our human subject mini-series.And you have a clear human subjects’ protection and monitoring plan developed for your application after tuning in to the second episode in the series.Now, what should you keep in mind after the award is made? The latest NIH All About Grantspodcast episode delves into just this issue. Lyndi Lahl, an NIH Human Subjects’ Officer, joins us (and her dog too!) in this final episode of this human subjects’ researchmini-series. Tune in for tips about important post-award requirements, what’s needed for annual progress reporting, engaging your IRB and NIH when a protocol change is needed, the difference between adverse events and unanticipated problems, and much more.

All About Grants Podcast: Human Subjects Research Post-Award

Your experimental designs are coming into focus. Sample sizes…power analyses…and treatment conditions, oh my! And, all throughout, perhaps laboratory animals are needed. But, are they? Can you actually replace them and still rigorously test the hypothesis? If not, maybe the protocol can be refined in such a way to reduce their overall numbers, while still ensuring their humane care and use? Considering alternatives to animals in your application is the topic of our next NIH All About Grants podcast. Drs. Neera Gopee with the NIH Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare and Christine Livingston with the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences join us for this conversation. We will go into the 3Rs (replace, refine, and reduce), helpful resources for relevant policies, what’s needed for the vertebrate animal section, role for IACUCs and peer review, as well as organoids, in silico models, and other alternatives…oh my again! On a related note, keep an eye out for recommendations coming from the Advisory Committee to the NIH Director working group on Enhancing Rigor, Transparency, and Translatability in Animal Research this December. Part of their charge is validating alternative models to animal research as well as considering benefits and burdens of registering animal studies. Their recommendations will also encompass public feedback in response to a Request for Information (NOT-OD-20-130) released this summer (see this NIH Open Mike blog post for more).

Considering Alternatives to Animals

You have done your homework. Read the requisite materials on human subjects. Spoken with program staff at NIH. Even listened to Part 1 of this podcast mini-series for some insights on how you know if you are doing human subjects research. And, now you are ready for the next step: explaining in the application how research participants will be protected and monitored. Dawn Corbett, NIH’s Inclusion Policy Officer, shares why human subjects’ protection and monitoring plans are important in this next NIH’s All About Grants podcast. We will discuss what should be included in these plans, what should be left out, what are risks and what are benefits to study participants, how reviewers assess it all, and so much more.

Human Subjects Protection and Monitoring Plans

That’s a bit…odd. That gel image looks photoshopped. The data looks to good to be true. And, wait a second, that figure appeared in another paper! These are examples of research misconduct. What do you do if you suspect research misconduct? Join us for this next installment of NIH’s All About Grants podcast with Dr. Christine Ring on addressing research misconduct. As an NIH Research Integrity Officer, she will share with us what is meant by fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism, how it affects the integrity of our supported research, what to do if you suspect research misconduct, how we work with the HHS Office of Research Integrity when responding to an allegation, and much more.

Research Misconduct

The Office of Extramural Research (OER) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) presents conversations with NIH staff members. Designed for investigators, fellows, students, research administrators, and others, we provide insights on grant topics from those who live and breathe the information. In mp3 and updated monthly. 216139

hubhopper

All About Grants at NIH

hubhopper