This is Listen to the Editors, a series of interviews with journal editors to unveil the trends in research on Operations and Supply Chain Management.   I am your host, Iuri Gavronski.   This month, we are posting in our podcast a workshop promoted by the Journal of Supply Chain Management, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, and the Journal of Business Logistics.   The editors-in-chief for these four journals convened online on Aug 20, 2020 to promote a workshop for reviewers and we find very interesting their insights on ethics on publication, how do you interact with the editors, and what is expected from the reviewers. I hope our listeners enjoy this episode.   The editors that were presenting and discussing were: * Barbara B. Flynn; Professor Kelley School of Business at the Indiana University, co-EIC for the Journal of Supply Chain Management * David Cantor; Professor of Supply Chain Management at Iowa State University - Ivy College of Business, co-EIC for the Journal of Supply Chain Management * Wendy Tate; Professor of Supply Chain Management Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Management at the University of Tennessee, co-EIC for the Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. * Louise A. Knight, Full Professor at the University of Twente, co-EIC for the Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. * Robert D. Klassen; Professor of Operations Management at Ivey Business School, co-EIC for the International Journal of Operations and Production Management * Constantin Blome, Professor in Operations Management at the University of Sussex Business School, co-EIC for the International Journal of Operations and Production Management * Beth Davis-Sramek; Gayle Parks Forehand Professor of Supply Chain Management; Auburn University; Co-EIC for Journal of Business Logistics We also post below some conversations that ensued in the chat for the Zoom session: 09:10:44 From Ted Farris : Never was "taught" how to review as a doctoral student so developed my own process. What order do you suggest one conducts a review...red the whole thing through or in pieces and then the whole thing through. For example, I start with the abstract and then go to the tables and figures (to make sure they stand by themselves), then the references, then the conclusion, then the main text. 09:16:14 From Ted Farris : Time to conduct a review...how long should it take? 09:17:18 From Himanshu Shee : It is my work, wondering why can’t I reuse it in my work again. Looks silly but I am still curious to use!! 09:18:56 From Gina McNally : What is the red flag level for plagiarism checker? 09:19:13 From Louise KNIGHT : Every article must make an original contribution, so recycling your own work is not considered acceptable 09:20:17 From Barbara Flynn : We'll talk about the red flag level during the Q&A, but we start getting alarmed as that number approaches 20%. 09:20:22 From Marika Tuomela-Pyykkönen : What software would you recommend for checking the (self)plagiarism? 09:22:17 From Louise KNIGHT : Déjà lu: On the limits of data reuse across multiple publications Erik M.van Raaij https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2018.06.002 09:22:19 From Ted Farris : I am writing a reprise of a published paper written in 2002 (since so much has changed) and am submitting to the same journal. What % of the original content is usable? 09:22:24 From Himanshu Shee : Each journal has a fixed format and empirical study has a kind of fixed writing style. So overlapping of text and methodological context get duplicated easily. Wondering how to rephrase or make different!! 09:26:10 From Constantin Blome : @Himanshu: There are of course some overlaps in the methodology section. That is to a certain extent okay, but there are many different ways to express also statistics and everybody makes his or her life easier by avoiding copying also in these sections. Having said that copying particularly in the other sections is a no-go, including self-plagiarism. 09:26:51 From Ted Farris : good tip on authors running a plagiarism checker! As a reviewer should I assume the editors have done this or should reviewers runs a checker? 09:27:28 From Barbara Flynn : Yes, our submission systems automatically do this for every submission, and we pay close attention to it. 09:27:32 From Constantin Blome : @Ted: Most journals run them now. 09:27:52 From Louise KNIGHT : Editors will run checks but a reviewer should raise any concerns with the editor 09:28:26 From Barbara Flynn : Yes, it's always appropriate to contact the editor if you have any sort of concerns as a reviewer. 09:29:08 From Constantin Blome : What editors are often less aware of and where reviewers can do a great job is where similar data has been used before. It is always helpful in case reviewers identify that content-wise (not plagiarism-wise) is similar. 09:30:09 From Louise KNIGHT : Journals provide guidelines to reviewers. Also check out general advice on reviewing provided by publishers, for example from Elsevier: https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/how-to-review 09:33:49 From Gina McNally : Should reviewers include their recommendation in the comments to the authors? 09:35:53 From Constantin Blome : Some journals don't want to have that recommendation included, they make this explicit, but to a certain extent it also provides clarity. However, most important is the constructive feedback, not the recommendation per se, as the AE/ Editor should come up with the conclusion. 09:36:01 From Louise KNIGHT : For JPSM, we prefer not - you provide the recommendation separately. If it's a difficult call, then add a note to the editor. 09:38:00 From Himanshu Shee : On average two days will be good I guess…. To read and make the report ready…. Can’t afford more than that! 09:38:35 From Beth Davis-Sramek : At JBL, it's fine to include your recommendation. I generally start with an "overview" section. In it, I offer positive comments and then say something like, "however, there are some issues that are offered in more detail below that prevent me from recommending that the paper move forward." There can be a "soft" way to communicate a rejection, but I think it's important to provide clarity to the author(s). 09:40:06 From Ted Farris : at what point as a reviewer is a paper so bad that you stop in the middle and return it to the editor 09:40:06 From Himanshu Shee : Does the editor engage more than 3 reviewers to reject a paper? 09:40:08 From Constantin Blome : I agree here. Sometimes it is strange to receive a very friendly review, but then the author writes to the editor that this is a clear reject. It's important to be friendly and constructive, but also authentic. Not easy at all. 09:41:00 From Constantin Blome : @Ted: I would say, almost never. 09:42:13 From Beth Davis-Sramek : @Ted: My hope would be that if we send the paper out for review, then it is worth a full review. We will desk reject those that do not meet a minimum quality threshold. 09:43:37 From Anníbal Sodero - Ohio State University - Fisher College : I typically read the main paper cited by the paper I am reviewing and usually skim through a couple of other ones. I like to ensure authors are building on the work of others in a "proper" way, that is, that there is no misrepresentation. A common mistake is to cite a work just for the sake of having a reference, while the work actually contradicts what the authors are claiming. It also helps me to understand where the authors are coming from and what is the contribution they are making. 09:44:59 From Himanshu Shee : What exactly the desk review comprises of, it takes up to a couple of wks even to reject or decide on to put forward to review. 09:48:54 From Beth Davis-Sramek : @Himanshu: At JBL our goal will be to return a desk-rejected manuscript very quickly. I think two weeks is reasonable. 09:49:16 From Constantin Blome : At IJOPM desk rejects takes 1-5 days typically. If it takes longer then there is a reason for it (internal discussions on the manuscript etc). I guess 95% are done in 1-5 days. We have two steps: editorial assistant (who is also an academic) and then one of the four EICs. 09:49:22 From Louise KNIGHT : @Himanshu: Desk reviews vary - sometimes it is very clear that the standard is inadequate or there is not a good fit to the journal. Sometimes a much closer reading is needed, and this reveals that we do not think the paper has a fair prospect 09:49:49 From Constantin Blome : Interestingly enough we receive then emails from authors asking whether we read the manuscript at all as the turnaround time is fast. Of course, we do;-) 09:51:53 From Beth Davis-Sramek : HA! - So maybe two weeks isn't reasonable! Good point - some are very clearly desk rejects, and others may require more feedback, especially if we see potential and suggest to authors that they can fix the issues and resubmit. 09:53:26 From Ted Farris : Are there times of the year when it is best to submit something...are reviewers more available at different times (Christmas Break v middle of a semester) 09:54:08 From Barbara Flynn : I don't think so, but there are definitely better times for authors - we see seasonality in submissions. For example, a lot of manuscripts are submitted at the end of the summer, just before classes begin. 09:55:04 From Constantin Blome : Reviews over July/ August take longer. We also see that in the pandemic reviews slowed down. 09:55:12 From Ted Farris : A lot of times I comment to the authors about "unsubstantiated conjecture" where they do not support statements or make statements out of the blue. Reasonable comment to the authors? 09:55:40 From Barbara Flynn : Definitely. It's up to authors to make their points clear, not the reviewers and readers to guess. 09:55:45 From Constantin Blome : absolutely, but always good to give the example and give an example how this could be done better. 09:56:29 From Constantin Blome : Often the authors aren't aware that statements are not supported, but of course you don't have to list every unsupported sentence. 09:57:07 From Barbara Flynn : Agreed, it seems obvious to the authors because they are so familiar with the literature, but it's not obvious to others. 09:57:40 From Beth Davis-Sramek : I might also rephrase it to something like, "you need to provide more evidence from the literature that supports this statement/hypothesis/rationale" etc... 10:02:49 From Louise KNIGHT : I agree with that suggestion for rephrasing the point! 10:04:27 From Gina McNally : Can you post the references here in the chat, please? Thanks! 10:04:39 From Himanshu Shee : What methodology is usually a winner? Survey, interviews, mixed methods, longitudinal studies? 10:04:50 From jmuniz : Thanks for share the knowledge. Go Vols 10:06:35 From Constantin Blome : Important is that plagiarism only show "potential plagiarism" and we have to check then whether it is "real plagiarism". 10:07:06 From Arun Kumar Deshmukh : How much is the tolerable limit of similarity index? 10:07:14 From Juliette : Thank you for they great tips! 10:07:35 From Constantin Blome : There is no fixed percentage, but we look in far more detail with 20% or more. 10:07:38 From Juliette : *the not they 10:08:36 From Arun Kumar Deshmukh : Thanks Constantin Blome 10:09:39 From Himanshu Shee : It is so easy to get over 20% plagiarism adding those 1% coming’s from the references, key words and jargons etc… 10:09:50 From Constantin Blome : However, there are also many papers we still send out that have more than 20% in the software indicated, but it is not showing clear cases of plagiarism. So it depends. 10:10:28 From Himanshu Shee : Thanks Constantin 10:10:50 From Constantin Blome : Just to share, the nastiest emails I got from authors were all around plagiarism scores. 10:11:10 From Barbara Flynn : Huff, A.S., 2009. Evaluation of research design and outcomes. In Huff, A.S., Designing Research for Publication, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Koberg, D. & Bagnall, J., 1976. The Universal Traveler. New York: William Kaufman. De Bono, E., 1999. Six Thinking Hats. Boston: Little, Brown. Also http://www.edwdebono.com/ 10:11:27 From Wendy Tate : I agree with Constantin re the emails! 10:14:06 From Louise KNIGHT : A very low (artificially low) score in the plagiarism checker can be a trigger for a closer look. The tool indicates % recognised text, that's all - the rest is for editors to interpret 10:15:28 From Arun Kumar Deshmukh : Sometimes we get a paper with a newer method for review. Should we refuse to review it or the other part of the manuscripts should be evaluated without commenting on the method part? 10:15:56 From Constantin Blome : Personally, I also think that in some institutions PhDs reviews continuously for their supervisors. This would be considered highly unethical. 10:16:45 From Constantin Blome : I. suggest contact the editor. 10:18:17 From Arun Kumar Deshmukh : Thanks a lot 10:22:43 From Ted Farris : the better journals that I review for typically send feedback after all the reviews are in plsace 10:23:04 From Himanshu Shee : I suppose the journal offers a summary of the all reviews so one can see what others have done vs you 10:23:14 From marcon.arthur : Is it appropriate to contact the editor when the reviewers were not clear in their review or when they provide contradictory recommendations? For example, contacting the editor via email when we are working on the corrections of the paper 10:23:59 From Arun Kumar Deshmukh : As an editor, how you decide the fate of manuscripts when two reviewers suggest minor revision and one suggests the rejection? 10:24:03 From Constantin Blome : yes, this is fine Marcon 10:25:14 From Barbara Flynn : It's always fine to contact the editor about anything 10:25:24 From Constantin Blome : @Arun: first, we read the manuscript, but typically AEs would make the call first. But this is not different to any other combination of recommendations. 10:25:48 From Constantin Blome : I agree with Barb.   Background music: ================= “Night & Day” by Dee Yan-Key is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Dee_Yan-Key/years_and_years_ago/08--Dee_Yan-Key-Night___Day 

Listen to the Editors

Workshop for Reviewers – Barb Flynn, Wendy Tate et al.

This is Listen to the Editors, a series of interviews with journal editors to unveil the trends in research for Operations and Supply Chain Management. In this episode, we are interviewing two of the guest editors for the Journal of Operations Management (JOM) Special Issue on Covid-19, Chris Voss and Xiande Zhao. The host for this show is Iuri Gavronski, Associate Professor for the Graduate Program in Business for the UNISINOS Jesuit University. Listen to the editors is an initiative of the Operations and Supply Chain Management division of the Academy of Management. We post our interviews monthly in our division website. You can discuss any of the topics of this episode using our interactive tool, https://connect.aom.org. Using the discussion section of our site, you can also post suggestions for questions, journal editors you would like to hear from, and requests for clarifications. You can also subscribe to our podcast in Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or with the Podcast Addict app on Android. Website for the Journal: ======================== https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18731317 Call for Papers: ================ https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/pb-assets/assets/18731317/JOM%20CFP%20-%20COVID-19%20and%20Global%20Supply%20Chains-1586282145923.pdf Editors’ Bios: ============== Dr. Hau L. Lee is the Thoma Professor of Operations, Information and Technology at the Stanford Graduate School of Business. His areas of specialization include global value chain innovations, supply chain management, global logistics, inventory modeling, and environmental and social responsibility. He was the founding director of the Stanford Institute for Innovations in Developing Economies, and is a co-director of the Stanford Value Chain Innovation Initiative. He has published widely in journals such as Management Science, Operations Research, Harvard Business Review, Sloan Management Review, Supply Chain Management Review, Production and Operations Management, IIE Transactions, and Interfaces, etc. He has served on the editorial boards of many international journals. From 1997-2003, he was the Editor-in-Chief of Management Science. In 2006, he was President of the Production and Operations Management Society. He was elected to the National Academy of Engineering in 2010. Dr. Xiande Zhao is JD.COM Chair Professor in Operations and Supply Chain Management at China Europe International Business School (CEIBS). His recent research interests mostly focus on supply chain and business model innovations, supply chain finance, digital supply chain, and supply chain optimization using big data. He has published over 150 journal articles in leading journals including Journal of Operations Management, Production and Operations Management, Journal of Consumer Research, European Journal of Operations Research, International Journal of Production Research and International Journal of Production Economics. He is an Associate Editor for Journal of Operations Management, Decision Sciences, and a Senior Editor of Production and Operations Management. He is also the co-Chief Editor for Journal of Data, Information and Management. He is the founder and honourable president of Association of Supply Chain and Operations Management (ASCOM), and was the President of Asia Pacific Institute of Decision Sciences (APDSI). He also received more than 10 academic awards including the Jack Meredith best paper award from Journal of Operations Management. Dr. Xiang Li is a professor with the School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology. His recent research interests mostly focus on transport management, logistics management, and optimization under uncertainty, big-data analytics and applications. He has published over 80 articles in international journals including Transportation Research Part B, Transportation Research Part C, Information Sciences, European Journal of Operational Research, Omega, Computer and Industrial Engineering, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, and so on. He is the Editor-in-Chief for the Journal of Data, Information and Management, Associate Editor for Information Sciences, Transportmetrica B, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, and editorial board member for International Journal of General Systems. He was the president of International Conference on Intelligent Transportation and Logistics with Big Data (2017, 2018, and 2019). Dr. Chris Voss is Professor of Operations Management at Warwick Business School and Emeritus Professor of Operations Management at London Business School where he has served as deputy dean. His recent research has included supply-chain management, service supply chains, architecture and modularity, e-services, and service innovation. He has published in leading journals including Journal of Operations Management, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Production and Operations Management, IEEE Transactions, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Decision Science Journal, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, International Journal of Journal of Production Economics, and Journal of Service Research. He is Associate Editor of the Journal of Service Research. He was co-founder and long-term chair of the European Operations Management Association, and serves on several editorial boards. He has received many academic awards including distinguished scholar of the OM division of the Academy of Management. Deadlines: ========== The full-paper submission: January 31, 2021 First Round Review and decisions: April 30, 2021 Second Round Revision Submission: July 31, 2021 Final round review and decisions: September 30, 2021 Acknowledgements: ================= Background music: ================= “Night & Day” by Dee Yan-Key is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Dee_Yan-Key/years_and_years_ago/08--Dee_Yan-Key-Night___Day 2020-04-14 - Episode 014 

JOM Special Issue on Covid-19 – Xiande Zhao and Chris Voss

This is Listen to the Editors, a series of interviews with journal editors to unveil the trends in research for Operations and Supply Chain Management. In this episode, we are interviewing the department editors for the Journal of Operations Management (JOM), John Gray and Gopesh Anand. The host for this show is Iuri Gavronski, Associate Professor for the Graduate Program in Business for the UNISINOS Jesuit University. Show outline (and timestamps): (0:40) What does a department editor do? (1:41) The editors present themselves. (2:58) What is the focus of the Strategy and Organization department? (5:34) What is the trend in Operations Strategy research? (10:42) Using archival data for Operations Strategy research. (17:27) Combining empirical and analytical approaches. (20:30) What types of experiments Operations Strategy research should hold? (23:52) Difficulties in training PhD students in empirical and analytical research. (29:11) When is a paper assigned to a department? (30:25) Grounds for desk rejection at the department editor level. (33:1) The link between associate editors and department editors. (37:30) How department editors manage the day-to-day operations of their department? (39:47) What is the share of the department? (41:30) Speed vs. reliability of the papers published in the journal (a.k.a., relevance vs. rigour). (42:52) How will JOM respond to covid-19? (44:58) Two extremes: papers well done that do not say anything and papers poorly written: editor’s advice. (46:13) What to do when you have papers in different journals that are too alike to raise concern. (51:53) The role of the cover letter in potential ethical issues in the paper. Listen to the editors is an initiative of the Operations and Supply Chain Management division of the Academy of Management. We post our interviews monthly in our division website. You can discuss any of the topics of this episode using our interactive tool, https://connect.aom.org. Using the discussion section of our site, you can also post suggestions for questions, journal editors you would like to hear from, and requests for clarifications. You can also subscribe to our podcast in Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or with the Podcast Addict app on Android. Website for the Journal: ======================== https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18731317 Papers cited in this episode: ============================= Anand, G., & Gray, J. V. (2017). Strategy and organization research in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 53-56(1), 1-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2017.09.001 Editors’ Bios: ============== Dr. Gray’s research has been published in top multi-disciplinary management journals, including Decision Sciences, Management Science and Organization Science; and top operations and supply chain journals, including the Journal of Operations Management, the Journal of Supply Chain Management, and Production and Operations Management. His research has received several awards. In 2018, one of his papers was awarded the Jack Meredith Best Paper award as the best paper published in the Journal of Operations Management during the calendar year 2017. In 2013, another paper on global food supply chains received the Emerald Citations of Excellence award, recognizing its impact. Two of his papers were awarded the OM Division's Chan Hahn best paper award at the Academy of Management conference (2012 and 2014). Within Fisher, he was named to the inaugural class of Dean’s Faculty Fellows, a distinction he held from 2014-2017. He has also received substantial external funding. He is currently co-PI of a $1.7 million contract with the FDA awarded October 2019. He is also a member of a team developing pharmaceutical quality scorecards for the FDA as part of a major grant subaward received in December 2017. In addition to service to his department and the university, he serves as a department editor for the Journal of Operations Management’s Strategy and Organization Department and a senior editor for Production and Operations Management’s Industry Studies and Public Policy Department (for which he was awarded Outstanding Senior Editor in 2017). Among his service to professional societies, he completed in August 2018 a five-year leadership role for the Academy of Management’s OSCM Division. For this service, in August 2018 he received the division's Distinguished Service award. He is serving as a program chair for the Industry Studies Association from 2019-2022. Dr. Gopesh Anand is the Academic Director, Operations Management, Business Administration, University of Illinois, 2019 to present, and Assistant and Associate Professor of Business Administration, University of Illinois, 2006 to present. He is the Co-Editor, Strategy & Organization Department, Journal of Operations Management, 2017 to present, Senior Editor and Reviewer, Production and Operations Management Society Journal, 2013 to present, Associate Editor and Reviewer, Decision Science Journal, 2011 to present. Dr. Gopesh’s research interests are Operations Strategy and Continuous Improvement. Acknowledgements: ================= Background music: ================= “Night & Day” by Dee Yan-Key is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Dee_Yan-Key/years_and_years_ago/08--Dee_Yan-Key-Night___Day 2020-03-18 - Episode 013 

Journal of Operations Management (JOM) – John Gray and Gopesh Anand

This is the twelfth episode of Listen to the Editors, a series of interviews with journal editors to unveil the trends in research for Operations and Supply Chain Management. In this episode, we are interviewing the editor-in-chief for the International Journal of Production Economics, Stefan Minner. The host for this show is Iuri Gavronski, Associate Professor for the Graduate Program in Business for the UNISINOS Jesuit University. Listen to the editors is an initiative of the Operations and Supply Chain Management division of the Academy of Management. We post our interviews monthly in our division website. You can discuss any of the topics of this episode using our interactive tool, https://connect.aom.org. Using the discussion section of our site, you can also post suggestions for questions, journal editors you would like to hear from, and requests for clarifications. You can also subscribe to our podcast in Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or with the Podcast Addict app on Android. Websites for the Journal: ========================= https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-production-economics Call for papers: ================ https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-production-economics/call-for-papers Editor Bio: =========== Stefan Minner is a Full Professor for Logistics and Supply Chain Management at the School of Management, Technical University of Munich (TUM). He serves on several editorial boards of logistics and operations journals. Currently, Stefan Minner is the Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal of Production Economics. His research interests are in global supply chain design, transportation optimization and inventory management and his work are published in many peer-reviewed journals, including Production and Operations Management, Management Science, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, Operations Research, Transportation Research Part B, European Journal of Operational Research and OR Spectrum. He is a fellow of the International Society for Inventory Research (ISIR) and is currently vice-chairman of the scientific advisory board of the German Logistics Association (BVL), a member of the Research Committee of the European Logistics Association (ELA), and the speaker of the research training group Advanced Optimization in a Networked Economy (AdONE) at TUM. Acknowledgements: ================= Background music: ================= “Night & Day” by Dee Yan-Key is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Dee_Yan-Key/years_and_years_ago/08--Dee_Yan-Key-Night___Day 2020-02-29 - Episode 012 

International Journal of Production Economics (IJPE) – Stefan Minner

This is the eleventh episode of Listen to the Editors, a series of interviews with journal editors to unveil the trends in research for Operations and Supply Chain Management. In this episode, we are interviewing the Program Chair for the OSCM Division in the AOM 2020 Annual Meeting, Stephanie Eckerd. We discussed: the “under the hood” work of the scholarly program. Points authors should pay attention before submitting their manuscripts. What first-time attendees should pay attention to during the Academy of Management Annual Meeting. The host for this show is Iuri Gavronski, Associate Professor for the Graduate Program in Business for the UNISINOS Jesuit University. Listen to the editors is an initiative of the Operations and Supply Chain Management division of the Academy of Management. We post our interviews monthly in our division website. You can discuss any of the topics of this episode using our interactive tool, https://connect.aom.org. Using the discussion section of our site, you can also post suggestions for questions, journal editors you would like to hear from, and requests for clarifications. You can also subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or with the Podcast Addict app on Android. Editor's Bio: ============= Sean M. Handley is an associate professor of management science. Handley previously served on the faculty at the University of Notre Dame and Rutgers University. He obtained his Ph.D. and MBA from The Ohio State University, and received his B.S. in Industrial Management from the University of Cincinnati. Prior to entering academics, Handley served in multiple operational and supply chain roles working for a logistics subsidiary of Honda Motor, CEVA Logistics (formerly CTI), and GE Aviation among others. Handley is teaching, or has taught, graduate and undergraduate courses on operations and supply chain management, process analytics, business statistics, and procurement management and global sourcing. Handley’s primary scholarly interests lie in studying the challenges and approaches to managing outsourced business processes with a particular interest in: formal and informal mechanisms for managing inter-organizational relationships, the management of offshore outsourcing engagements, and quality management with outsourced manufacturing. His research has been published in several leading academic journals including Journal of Operations Management, Production and Operations Management, Decision Sciences, Strategic Management Journal, MIS Quarterly and Journal of Business Logistics. He serves on the editorial review board for Production and Operations Management and Journal of Supply Chain Management, and is an associate editor for the Journal of Operations Management. Research interests: Outsourcing, offshoring, buyer-supplier relationships, inter-organizational quality management, sourcing healthcare information systems Background music: ================= “Night & Day” by Dee Yan-Key is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Dee_Yan-Key/years_and_years_ago/08--Dee_Yan-Key-Night___Day 2019-12-10 - Episode 011 

AOM 2020 Scholarly Program, Sean Handley

This is the tenth episode of Listen to the Editors, a series of interviews with journal editors to unveil the trends in research for Operations and Supply Chain Management. In this episode, we are interviewing the PDW Chair for the OSCM Division in the AOM 2020 Annual Meeting, Stephanie Eckerd. We discussed: what is a PDW; who should submit a PDW proposal; how PDWs interface with the 2020 theme for the AOM Meeting. The host for this show is Iuri Gavronski, Associate Professor for the Graduate Program in Business for the UNISINOS Jesuit University. Listen to the editors is an initiative of the Operations and Supply Chain Management division of the Academy of Management. We post our interviews monthly in our division website. You can discuss any of the topics of this episode using our interactive tool, https://connect.aom.org. Using the discussion section of our site, you can also post suggestions for questions, journal editors you would like to hear from, and requests for clarifications. You can also subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or with the Podcast Addict app on Android. Editor's Bio: ============= Stephanie Eckerd is an Assistant Professor of Operations Management, Kelley School of Business, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis. She serves as Associate Editor for the Journal of Operations Management and the Decision Sciences journal. Stephanie is the incoming PDW (Professional Development Workshop) Chair for the AOM 2020 Annual Meeting. Her research interests include supply chain relationships, interorganizational conflicts, and supply chain contracts. Stephanie's email is seckerd@iu.edu Background music: ================= “Night & Day” by Dee Yan-Key is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Dee_Yan-Key/years_and_years_ago/08--Dee_Yan-Key-Night___Day 2019-12-08 - Episode 010 

Professional Development Workshops (PDW), Stephanie Eckerd

This is the ninth episode of Listen to the Editors, a series of interviews with journal editors to unveil the trends in research for Operations and Supply Chain Management. In this episode, we are interviewing the editor-in-chief for the Academy of Management Review, Jay Barney. I believe it is vital to increase the reach of OM/SCM research to a broader audience. That would attract more students to our Ph.D. programs and keep our vibrant area alive. So I decided to reach a non-OSCM journal to a) make their processes more visible to our community and b) learn how we can appeal to their readers. I also asked some editors from OM/SCM journals to send me questions, and I am immensely indebted with them for their insights. The following is an outline of the interview (on most podcast players, you can click on the timestamp and jump to the point of the audio file): (2:17) Jay reflects on the mission of the AMR (3:45) Jay discusses changes in the mission of the journal over time. (5:03) General information on the journal: issues/year, sections of the journal, papers/year. (6:04) Submission levels (6:36) Acceptance rates of the journal. (7:08) Editorial process. Breakdown of the rejects by stage. Main causes for desk-rejects. (11:31) Distinctive editorial policy for AMR: two rounds of reviews. (14:05) Term of the editor (14:15) Why Jay Barney decided to be the editor-in-chief for AMR (18:35) Why AMR does not have an OM/SCM department or associate editor. (23:15) How do the authors suggest associate editors? (26:07) The main KPI for AMR is time: if the editor or the reviewer takes too long to act, Jay sends them a personal email. (28:55) AMR had 7.3 million downloads in 2018. (30:19) Breakdown of downloads by country. (30:56) Why the diversity of the authors (i.e., non-native English speakers) is increasing in AMR. (31:55) Open calls for papers (34:21) How AMR papers are publicized outside academic audiences. (37:06) How AMR impacts the managerial audience. (41:27) What are phenomenal theories? How different are they from empirical studies. (43:50) Building theories from cases, mathematical models, simulations. (48:10) How to publish interventionist research on AMR (49:29) Questions from editors-in-chief of OM/SCM journals: how can OSCM scholars have an impact on the general management theory. (56:45) It is quite hard interviewing Jay Barney and not talking about RBV... I could not resist. In fact, I was just forwarding Tom’s question... ;-) The host for this show is Iuri Gavronski, Associate Professor for the Graduate Program in Business for the UNISINOS Jesuit University. Listen to the editors is an initiative of the Operations and Supply Chain Management division of the Academy of Management. We post our interviews monthly in our division website. You can discuss any of the topics of this episode using our interactive tool, https://connect.aom.org. Using the discussion section of our site, you can also post suggestions for questions, journal editors you would like to hear from, and requests for clarifications. You can also subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or with the Podcast Addict app on Android. Websites for the Journal: ========================= http://aom.org/Publications/AMR/Academy-of-Management-Review.aspx http://aom.org/Publications/AMR/tab-content/Read-AMR-Online.aspx http://aom.org/Publications/AMR/Information-for-Contributors.aspx http://aom.org/Publications/AMR/Theory-Building-Resources.aspx http://amr.aom.org/cgi/collection/amr_article_winners_collect http://aom.org/Publications/AMR/From-the-Editor-Essays-on-Writing-Theory.aspx https://aom.org/Publications/AMR/Frequently-Asked-Questions.aspx http://aom.org/uploadedFiles/Publications/AMR/2019_October_STF.pdf Other info: =========== We referenced these papers in the podcast: Barney, J. (2017). Editor’s Comments: Theory Contributions and the AMR Review Process. Academy of Management Review, 43(1), 1-4. doi:10.5465/amr.2017.0540 Barney, J. (2018). Editor’s Comments: Positioning a Theory Paper for Publication. Academy of Management Review, 43(3), 345-348. doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0112 Barney, J. (2018). Why resource-based theory’s model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 39(13), 3305-3325. doi:10.1002/smj.2949 Meredith, J. R., and Pilkington, A. (2018), Assessing the exchange of knowledge between operations management and other fields: Some challenges and opportunities. Journal of Operations Management, 60: 47-53. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2018.05.004 Editor's Bio: ============= Jay Barney is a Presidential Professor of Strategic Management and the Pierre Lassonde Chair of Social Entrepreneurship at the University of Utah David Eccles School of Business. He previously served as a professor of management and held the Chase Chair for Excellence in Corporate Strategy at the Ohio State University Max M. Fisher College of Business. His research focuses on the relationship between costly-to-copy firm skills and capabilities and sustained competitive advantage. He has also researched the actions entrepreneurs take to form the opportunities they try to exploit. He has served as an officer of both the Business Policy and Strategy Division of the Academy of Management and the Strategic Management Society and has served as an associate editor at the Journal of Management, senior editor for Organization Science, and co-editor at the Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. His work has been published in numerous leading outlets, including the Strategic Management Journal, the Academy of Management Review, the Academy of Management Journal, Management Science, and is among the most cited work in the fields of strategic management and entrepreneurship. In addition to his teaching and research, he presents executive training programs throughout the U.S. and Europe and consults with firms on large-scale organizational change and strategic analysis. Dr. Jay Barney is an SMS Fellow as well as a fellow of the Academy of Management. He has received honorary doctorate degrees from the University of Lund (Sweden), the Copenhagen Business School, and Universidad Pontificia Comillas (Spain), and has had honorary visiting professor positions in New Zealand, the U.K. and China. Acknowledgements: ================= I want to thank the editors that sent questions for the interview. I hope I had relayed them correctly. Mark Pagell Co-Editor-in-Chief The Journal of Supply Chain Management Why OSCM scholars look to general management for ideas and inspiration, but the reverse does not seem to occur? Subodha Kumar Deputy Editor and Department Editor, Production and Operations Management Journal How can AOM journals reach out to the OM community and vice-versa? Walter Zinn Co-editor-in-chief Journal of Business Logistics Please say hi to him in my name as he used to be at Ohio State for a while when I first got here. Do you foresee that in the near future OM/SCM research might either gain or lose “space” in the general management literature? Why? Tyson Browning Co-editor-in-chief for Journal of Operations Management It might be interesting to ask him what (theories, methods, etc.) the broad management community should be learning from the OSCM community. Thomas J. Goldsby Co-Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Business Logistics 1) What supply chain-related questions would be of interest to the AMR readership? Are there domains of particular intrigue that our community should consider? 2) Jay was instrumental in forwarding the RBV theory of competitive strategy. Clearly, SCM researchers have embraced it in a big way to frame and explain hypothesized relationships in their inquiries. Does he have any suggestions of limits to RBV or aspects of its application that he sees as ill-suited to SCM inquiry? 3) Conversely, how does he see RBV adapting to multi-organizational resource collaboration in SCM -- in other words, do you see SCM areas calling for further exploration and development with RBV application? Background music: ================= “Night & Day” by Dee Yan-Key is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Dee_Yan-Key/years_and_years_ago/08--Dee_Yan-Key-Night___Day 2019-09-11 - Episode 009 

Academy of Management Review (AMR), Jay Barney

This is the eighth episode of Listen to the Editors, a series of interviews with journal editors to unveil the trends in research for Operations and Supply Chain Management. This month we recorded our episode live in the Meet the Editors session at the 2019 Academy of Management Annual Conference. That session took place on August 12th. David Cantor was chairing the session. We had five editors representing four journals. Wendy Tate is the co-editor-in-chief of the Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management. Morgan Swink was representing the International Journal of Operations and Production Management. Chris Voss was representing the Journal of Service Management. Tyson Browning and Suzanne de Treville are the co-editors-in-chief of the Journal of Operations Management. While the entire session was interesting, I will place here some pointers to the contents: (01:22) Editors present themselves and provide some highlights of their journal’s mission (08:47) David asks recommendations for authors (09:03) Wendy: “read the journal.” (09:46) Wendy says that plagiarism, besides fit, is one top reason for desk-rejection in the JPSM. (10:27) Morgan builds on that and says that the methods section are a frequent source of plagiarism and self-plagiarism (13:15) Tyson provides an insight on the cover letter (16:34) Suzanne offers a delicious anecdote on the cover letter (Annals of Accounting) (18:44) David asks about non-traditional empirical contexts (24:13) Suzanne weights in on interventionist research (24:52) David asks how to describe data and methods (level of detail), especially when they are not well-known or very complex (27:41) Tyson attributes the plagiarism on the methods to the desire to recite the right incantations; hence authors should be very familiar with the methods and the state-of-the-art (29:00) Chris provided an example, where he and his co-authors were able to convince the reviewers by giving the full method description in the supplemental material. They initially did not provide the complete description to limit the size of the paper. (29:55) Morgan suggests that authors explain qualitative methods because reviewers are more familiar with quantitative empirical methods (31:51) David asked about supply networks research and open data (34:00) Suzanne weights in on sample size (35:32) A member of the audience has the impression that 100 cases are too few for a top journal (39:01) Suzanne explains why editors are tired of hearing about gaps (40:12) Morgan discusses rules of thumb, hard rules, and guidelines (41:08) Tyson and Chris elaborate on the trade-off between rigor and interest (41:43) Iuri asks about the role of surveys in modern OSCM research. Morgan gives his thoughts. (45:20) Wendy provides her opinion on data obtained by survey firms (46:07) Tyson gives some suggestions for sound survey design The host for this show is Iuri Gavronski, Associate Professor for the Graduate Program in Business for the UNISINOS Jesuit University. Listen to the editors is an initiative of the Operations and Supply Chain Management division of the Academy of Management. We post our interviews monthly in our division website. You can discuss any of the topics of this episode using our interactive tool, https://connect.aom.org. Using the discussion section of our site, you can also post suggestions for questions, journal editors you would like to hear from, and requests for clarifications. You can also subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or with the Podcast Addict app on Android. Background music: ================= “Night & Day” by Dee Yan-Key is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Dee_Yan-Key/years_and_years_ago/08--Dee_Yan-Key-Night___Day 2019-08-24 - Episode 008

AOM 2019 Meeting - OSCM Meet the Editors session

This is the seventh episode of Listen to the Editors, a series of interviews with journal editors to unveil the trends in research for Operations and Supply Chain Management. In this episode we are interviewing the editors-in-chief for the Journal of Business Logistics (JBL), professors Thomas Goldsby and Walter Zinn. * JBL has 150,000 downloads in 2018. * Global spread of downloads: US: 18%, UK: 12%, DE,CN: 7% – 1/3 from outside the top 10 countries. - 3 open calls for special issues: * Talent Management in SCM - due Aug. 31 * Artificial Inteligence, Robotics, and Employment - due Oct. 31 * Digital Supply Chain - Dec. 1 Initiatives the Journal of Business Logistics is undertaking to publicize the papers and increasing their impact? * Some papers are reformatted and published in the Supply Chain Quarterly * Edge Conference - 3,000 supply chain managers * Part of doctoral consortium is have the PhD candidates walk in the conference, listen to the managers, and report back their findings. The host for this show is Iuri Gavronski, Associate Professor for the Graduate Program in Business for the UNISINOS Jesuit University. Listen to the editors is an initiative of the Operations and Supply Chain Management division of the Academy of Management. We post our interviews monthly in our division website. You can discuss any of the topics of this episode using our interactive tool, https://connect.aom.org. Using the discussion section of our site, you can also post suggestions for questions, journal editors you would like to hear from, and requests for clarifications. You can also subscribe to our podcast in Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or with the Podcast Addict app on Android. Websites for the Journal: ========================= Wiley’s main page for JBL (where the open CfPs can be found): https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/21581592 Also, several papers can be freely accessed there, including Walter’s “Historical Review of Postponement Research.” Other info: =========== The 40th Anniversary issue can be found at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/21581592/2019/40/1. CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly can be found at: https://www.supplychainquarterly.com/ Cites to some referenced papers in the podcast include: Castillo, Vincent E., John E. Bell, William J. Rose, and Alexandre M. Rodrigues. "Crowdsourcing last mile delivery: strategic implications and future research directions." Journal of Business Logistics 39, no. 1 (2018): 7-25. Garver, Michael S. "Threats to the Validity of Logistics and Supply Chain Management Research." Journal of Business Logistics 40, no. 1 (2019): 30-43. Miller, Jason W., Susan L. Golicic, and Brian S. Fugate. "Developing and testing a dynamic theory of motor carrier safety." Journal of Business Logistics 38, no. 2 (2017): 96-114 Miller, Jason W., Yemisi Bolumole, and Matthew A. Schwieterman. "Electronic Logging Device Compliance of Small and Medium Size Motor Carriers Prior to the December 18, 2017, Mandate." Journal of Business Logistics (2019). Editors' Bios: ============== Dr. Thomas Goldsby is the Harry T. Mangurian, Jr. Foundation Professor in Business, Professor of Logistics, and Chair of the Department of Marketing & Logistics at Ohio State's Fisher College of Business. Dr. Goldsby is Co-Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Business Logistics. His research interests include logistics strategy, supply chain integration, and the theory and practice of lean and agile supply chain strategies. He has published more than 50 articles in academic and professional journals and serves as a frequent speaker at academic conferences, executive education seminars, and professional meetings. He is co-author of five books on supply chain management and logistics. Walter Zinn is Professor of Logistics. He currently serves Ohio State’s Fisher College of Business as Associate Dean for Graduate Students and Programs. He previously served as Chairman of the Department of Marketing and Logistics (2010-2016) and as Director of the Master in Business Logistics Engineering (MBLE), an innovative joint program between the Schools of Business and Engineering (2005-2010). Dr. Zinn is Co-Editor-In-Chief of the Journal of Business Logistics. He formerly served the journal as the Systems Section Editor (1997-2001) and as Guest Editor for a Special Section on Logistics, Marketing and Supply Chain Strategies in 2000. Dr. Zinn’s research interests focus primarily on the relationship between customer service policy and inventory investment; particularly consumer response to stockouts, supply chain risk management, and the effects of inventory centralization and sales forecasting on safety stocks. He is also interested in logistics issues in Latin America. At Ohio State, Professor Zinn teaches logistics courses for undergraduate, MBA and MBLE students, including Field Problems in Logistics, where graduate students conduct consulting projects for corporations. Dr. Zinn also lectured in more than 100 executive development programs and spoke in logistics conferences and meetings in the U.S. and internationally. Dr. Zinn is fluent in Spanish and in Portuguese. cknowledgements: ================= I would like to thank my research assistant, Luiz Paulo R.C. Barcellos, for his help in editing the interview. All the glitches in the recording and in the final version of the audio file, though, are my responsibility. Background music: ================= “Night & Day” by Dee Yan-Key is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Dee_Yan-Key/years_and_years_ago/08--Dee_Yan-Key-Night___Day 2019-07-31 - Episode 007

Journal of Business Logistics (JBL) – Thomas Goldsby and Walter Zinn

This is the sixth episode of Listen to the Editors, a series of interviews with journal editors to unveil the trends in research for Operations and Supply Chain Management. In this episode we are interviewing the editor-in-chief for the Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, Christopher S. Tang. He served as the editor-in-chief since 2015 and his tenure ends in December 2020, as required by INFORMS, the sponsor of the journal. The MSOM journal exists since 1999 and is listed in the prestigious list FT50 since 2016. It received 500 submissions in 2018, with 13-14% acceptance rate. Dr. Tang attempted to make the editorial board more inclusive, in terms of gender, research methods, geographic location, and affiliation. Around 10-12% are desk-rejected, but the reasons vary, because department editors handle the majority of the papers. The papers were downloaded 26,000 times in 2018. We don't have data on the global reach of the journal. We discussed the editorial process. Dr. Tang implemented what he calls the 2+2+2 criteria: two reviewers, two rounds, two opportunities to resubmit. We had an overview of the Best Paper Award. We also talked about Practice-Based Research Competition, an unique approach to problem solving. The journal has currently two open calls for papers for Special Issues: Smart Operations, Smart Cities, due October 1, 2019, and Operations and Fintech, due September 1, 2020. The host for this show is Iuri Gavronski, Associate Professor for the Graduate Program in Business for the UNISINOS Jesuit University. Listen to the editors is an initiative of the Operations and Supply Chain Management division of the Academy of Management. We post our interviews monthly in our division website. You can discuss any of the topics of this episode using our interactive tool, https://connect.aom.org. Using the discussion section of our site, you can also post suggestions for questions, journal editors you would like to hear from, and requests for clarifications. You can also subscribe to our podcast in Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or with the Podcast Addict app on Android. Websites for the Journal: ========================= Main page: https://pubsonline.informs.org/journal/msom Editor Blog: https://www.informs.org/Blogs/M-SOM-Blogs/From-M-SOM-Journal-Editor Journal Blog: https://www.informs.org/Blogs/M-SOM-Blogs/M-SOM-Review Call for Papers: https://pubsonline.informs.org/page/msom/calls-for-papers MSOM Practice-Based Research Competition: https://pubsonline.informs.org/page/msom/practice-based-research-competition Other info: =========== EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Christopher S. Tang Frequency: Quarterly ISSN: 1523-4614 (Print) ISSN: 1526-5498 (Online) 2017 Impact Factor: 1.795 5-year Impact Factor: 2.867 Editor Bio: =========== Dr. Christopher S. Tang is Distinguished Professor at the University of California, Los Angeles. He holds the Edward W. Carter Chair in Business Administration. His early research focused on mainstream operations management problems, such as production planning and control, inventory models with yield uncertainties, design and control of flexible manufacturing lines, and capacity configuration problems. Tang expanded his interest and research, working with marketing researchers on production planning and promotion, joint pricing and production decision-making, and advanced booking. He continued his integration with retailing in the exploration of joint operations decisions and assortment planning, consumer shopping behaviors and product pricing. His research now spans different areas that include global supply chain management, retail operations and social business operations. His current interest focuses on social innovation for developing countries, looking at ways that companies can operate in the environment, doing good and doing well at the same time — “where corporate responsibility, social justice, and environmental stewardship can go hand in hand.” Acknowledgements: ================= I would like to thank my research assistant, Luiz Paulo R.C. Barcellos, for his help in editing the interview. All the glitches in the recording and in the final version of the audio file, though, are my responsibility. Background music: ================= “Night & Day” by Dee Yan-Key is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Dee_Yan-Key/years_and_years_ago/08--Dee_Yan-Key-Night___Day 2019-06-30 - Episode 006

Manufacturing & Service Operations Management (MSOM) – Christopher S. Tang

This is the fifth episode of Listen to the Editors, a series of interviews with journal editors to unveil the trends in research for Operations and Supply Chain Management. In this episode we are interviewing the co-editors-in-chief for the Journal of Operations Management, Suzanne de Treville and Tyson R. Browning. We discussed how to integrate research and practice (via design research or interventionist research). According to the editors, if a researcher joins a consulting project and everything goes well, there is no paper. However, if the researcher finds something new, a theory that does not work in the real world, and that novelty can bring insights that advance the knowledge, that paper might interest JOM. We also discussed the reasons for the 60% of papers that are desk-rejected by JOM. Among other reasons, such as lack of fit, poor methodology, or non-empirical papers, the editors mentioned the lack of “delta”. The delta is what do you learn from the paper. The editors are working harder to provide more feedback to those authors that have papers rejected at this stage. The editors are also looking into ways to deepen their relationship with ASCM (formerly known as APICS). They are attending the ASCM this year for the first time. They are also willing to receive research proposals for gathering data on the ASCM corporate members and responding to problems that the executives of such firms are interested in. This is a really long interview, but we believe you might enjoy, if you want to learn where the journal is heading to. The host for this show is Iuri Gavronski, Associate Professor for the Graduate Program in Business for the UNISINOS Jesuit University. Listen to the editors is an initiative of the Operations and Supply Chain Management division of the Academy of Management. We post our interviews monthly in our division website. You can discuss any of the topics of this episode using our interactive tool, https://connect.aom.org. Using the discussion section of our site, you can also post suggestions for questions, journal editors you would like to hear from, and requests for clarifications. You can also subscribe to our podcast in Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or with the Podcast Addict app on Android. Papers cited in this episode: ============================= Example of a JOM paper based on a consulting project (Browning 2010 JOM): http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.11.007 Editorial on recent developments at JOM: (Browning & de Treville 2018, JOM): http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2018.12.005 Methods for JOM, general (Guide & Ketokivi 2015, JOM): http://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(15)00056-X PLS (Rönkkö et al. 2016, JOM): http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2016.05.002 Level of analysis and single informants in surveys (Ketokivi 2019, JOM): http://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1011 Endogeneity: (Ketokivi & McIntosh 2017, JOM): http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2017.05.001 (Lu et al. 2018, JOM): http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2018.10.001 OM case study methodology: (Handfield & Melnyk 1998, JOM): http://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00022-0 (Meredith 1998, JOM): http://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00023-0 (Stuart et al. 2002, JOM): http://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00022-0 (Barratt et al. 2011, JOM): http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.06.002 (Ketokivi & Choi 2014, JOM): http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.004 Example of single-case study (Browning 2009, JOM): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2008.03.009 Website for the Journal: ======================== https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18731317 Editor Bios: ============ Dr. Suzanne de Treville is Full Professor of Operations Management at HEC Lausanne, University of Lausanne. Her research areas include: Competitive manufacturing in a high-cost environment, Supply chain management and lead time reduction, Lean production, Process consistency improvement, Health care operations, and Queuing theory-based mathematical modeling of operations. Dr. Tyson R. Browning is a full Professor of Operations Management in the Neeley School of Business at Texas Christian University, where he conducts research on managing complex projects (integrating managerial and engineering perspectives) and teaches MBA courses on project management, operations management, risk management, and process improvement. Background music: ================= “Night & Day” by Dee Yan-Key is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Dee_Yan-Key/years_and_years_ago/08--Dee_Yan-Key-Night___Day 2019-05-31 - Episode 005

Journal of Operations Management (JOM) – Suzanne de Treville and Tyson Browning

In this episode we are interviewing the editors of Production and Operations Management (POM) journal. We are joined by Dr. Kalyan Singhal and Dr. Subodha Kumar. Dr. Singhal is the editor-in-chief and Dr. Kumar is the deputy editor-in-chief for POM. This is the fourth episode of Listen to the Editors, a series of interviews with journal editors to unveil the trends in research for Operations and Supply Chain Management. The host for this show is Iuri Gavronski, Associate Professor for the Graduate Program in Business for the UNISINOS Jesuit University. POM, founded in 1992, is one of the longer living journals in the field. The mission of the journal is to publish research in all areas of Operations Management, in all research paradigms, according to Dr. Singhal. POM has 12 issues per year, and publishes around 150 papers in those issues. With 140,000-150,000 submissions per year, POM as a rejection rate of around 90%. According to Dr. Kumar, 70% of the rejections occur up to the first round. Dr. Singhal believes that one of the differentials of the journal is that most research go to the reviewers, so the authors have the opportunity to have a feedback on their manuscript. The main reasons for desk rejection is lack of fit (a paper that was not written for an Operations audience) or lack of a contribution. Dr. Singhal divides the contribution in two dimensions: a contribution to the theory and the solving of a real problem. The standard editorial process starts with the editor-in-chief assigning a department editor to the manuscript. In general, this department editor was the one suggested by the authors. Then the department editor assigns a senior editor. If the senior editor does not desk-rejects the paper, he or she assigns two to three reviewers for the manuscript.The senior editor then adds his or her recommendations, and sends for the department editor for the decision. We also discussed how to integrate analytical and empirical paradigms in a single paper. Dr. Kumar shares his personal experiences as author in this important subject. In 2017, POM articles were downloaded 300,000 times. Regarding the global reach, the share of downloads was 29% for China, 23% US, 6% UK, 18% others. Calls for Papers: ================= See http://www.poms.org/journal/announcements/ Open: Sustainability Planned: Disruptive Technologies Website for the Journal: ======================== https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/19375956 Editor Bios: ============ Dr. Kalyan Singhal is the McCurdy Professor of Management in the Merrick School of Business. He founded the Production and Operation Management Society (POMS) in 1989, and he has been serving as editor-in-chief of the POMS journal Production and Operation Management since he founded it in 1992. Dr. Subodha Kumar is the Paul R. Anderson Distinguished Professor of Marketing and Supply Chain Management at Temple University’s Fox School of Business. He also serves as the Director of Center for Data Analytics and the Ph.D. Concentration Advisor for Operations and Supply Chain Management. Prof. Kumar is the Deputy Editor and a Department Editor of Production and Operations Management (POM), and the Deputy Editor-in-Chief of Management and Business Review. He has served as a Senior Editor of Decision Sciences (DSI) and an Associate Editor of Information Systems Research (ISR). He is the Associate Executive Director of POMS Information Technology Services, the Web Editor of POMS, and the Vice President of INFORMS Information Systems Society (ISS). Background music: ================= “Night & Day” by Dee Yan-Key is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Dee_Yan-Key/years_and_years_ago/08--Dee_Yan-Key-Night___Day 2019-04-29 - Episode 004

Production Operations and Management (POM) - Kalyan Singhal and Subodha Kumar

This is the 3rd episode of Listen to the Editors, a series of interviews with journal editors to unveil the trends in research for Operations and Supply Chain Management. In this episode, we are interviewing Cristina Thomsen Gimenez, co-editor in chief for the International Journal of Operations and Production Management (IJOPM). He shares this role with Constantin Blome and Tobias Schoenherr. Professor Gimenez is Professor, Department of Operations, Innovation and Data Sciences in ESADE Business School. She also serves as the Director of Identity and Mission for ESADE. The host for this show is Iuri Gavronski, Associate Professor for the Graduate Program in Business for the UNISINOS Jesuit University. *** We discuss the editorial process for the IJOPM. We also understand the reasons for 70% desk rejection rates at the journal. This is part of the new editorial strategy: having a more stringent process in the desk review and passing on to reviewers only papers with higher chance of publication. Once a paper passes this first round, the rejection rate drops to 30-40%. According to professor Gimenez, alignment with the mission, methods alien to the readers, and contribution, are the main reasons for desk rejection. She suggests three questions to test contribution: 1) What do we know about this topic? 2) What we don’t know about this topic that this particular paper covers? 3) Why do we need to know this new information? As for KPIs, the editorial team evaluates yearly impact factors. In the short term, they evaluate citations, downloads, submissions, and quality of submissions. The journal had 600,000 downloads and 9,700 citations in 2018. Open Calls for Papers: ====================== May 31: The hidden side of sustainable operations and supply chain management: Unanticipated outcomes, trade-offs and tensions (http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/call_for_papers.htm?id=7959) April 30: The Use of Social Media in Operations and Supply Chain Management (http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/call_for_papers.htm?id=7949) Papers Cited: ============= 1. Saileshsingh Gunessee, Nachiappan Subramanian, Kun Ning, (2018) "Natural disasters, PC supply chain and corporate performance", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 38 Issue: 9, pp.1796-1814, 2. Christian F. Durach, José A.D. Machuca, (2018) "A matter of perspective the role of interpersonal relationships in supply chain risk management", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 38 Issue: 10, pp.1866-1887, 3. Amy V. Benstead, Linda C. Hendry, Mark Stevenson, (2018) "Horizontal collaboration in response to modern slavery legislation: An action research project", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 38 Issue: 12, pp.2286-2312, 4. Stanley Frederick W.T. Lim, Jagjit Singh Srai, (2018) "Examining the anatomy of last-mile distribution in e-commerce omnichannel retailing: A supply network configuration approach", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 38 Issue: 9, pp.1735-1764. Website for the Journal: ======================== http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/ijopm.htm Background music: ================= “Night & Day” by Dee Yan-Key is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Dee_Yan-Key/years_and_years_ago/08--Dee_Yan-Key-Night___Day

International Journal of Operations and Production Management (IJOPM) - Cristina Gimenez Thomsen

This is the 2nd episode of Listen to the Editors, a series of interviews with journal editors to unveil the trends in research for Operations and Supply Chain Management. In this episode, we are interviewing Mark Pagell, co-editor in chief for the Journal of Supply Chain Management (JSCM). He shares this role with Barbara Flynn and Brian Fugate. Professor Pagell holds a Chair in Global Leadership and is a Professor of Sustainable Supply Chain Management at the University College Dublin, Business School. We discuss the editorial process for the JSCM. We also understand the reasons for 93% desk rejection rates at the journal, exploring the main problems in the papers that are rejected. Mark also discusses the main KPI for the journal: downloads. We look at the trend in downloads and at the breakdown by global regions. We also discuss the Emerging Discourse Incubator, a new format for fostering the conversation in papers submitted to Special Issues. Mark also talks about the initiatives of JSCM for publicizing the papers in the journal and increasing their impact. Papers cited: ============= Stolze, H. J., Mollenkopf, D. A., Thornton, L. , Brusco, M. J. and Flint, D. J. (2018), Supply Chain and Marketing Integration: Tension in Frontline Social Networks. J Supply Chain Manag, 54: 3-21. doi:10.1111/jscm.12169 https://youtu.be/HzPANlTzSAc Xiao, C. , Wilhelm, M. , Vaart, T. and Donk, D. P. (2019), Inside the Buying Firm: Exploring Responses to Paradoxical Tensions in Sustainable Supply Chain Management. J Supply Chain Manag, 55: 3-20. doi:10.1111/jscm.12170 https://youtu.be/2HUU9sPCu4A Akkermans, H. , Voss, C. and Oers, R. (2019), Ramp Up and Ramp Down Dynamics in Digital Services. J Supply Chain Manag. doi:10.1111/jscm.12189 https://youtu.be/zqZP0fv9Vmg Additional Links: ================= JSCM LinkedIn page: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/8651817/ JSCM YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxVuoLOjm_YtIqYjX5e9nRQ JSCM home page: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1745493x JSCM mission: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/1745493x/homepage/productinformation.html Background music: ================= “Night & Day” by Dee Yan-Key is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Dee_Yan-Key/years_and_years_ago/08--Dee_Yan-Key-Night___Day 2019-02-14 - Episode 002

Journal of Supply Chain Management (JSCM)- Mark Pagell

Given the proximity of the deadline for the AOM Annual Meeting submission, we will have a special program with Rachna Shah, the program chair for the OSCM division. Professor Sha is an associate professor in Supply Chain and Operations Department at Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota. Rachna Shah provides an overview of the evaluation process for the papers submitted to the Operations and Supply Chain Management (OSCM) Division of the Academy of Management. 2019-01-14 - Episode 001

AOM OSCM Program Chair 2019 - Rachna Shah

Listen to the Editors, a series of interviews with journal editors to unveil the trends in research for Operations and Supply Chain Management. Listen to the editors is an initiative of the Operations and Supply Chain Management division of the Academy of Management. We post our interviews monthly in our division website. You can discuss any of the topics of this episode using our interactive tool, connect.aom.org. Using the discussion section of our site, you can also post suggestions for questions, journal editors you would like to hear from, and requests for clarifications.

hubhopper

Listen to the Editors

hubhopper