Talk Truth 10.09.26 - Vince Byfield Part 2 | If Alberta became independent, who should control the government, the money and the laws? Vince Byfield returns for Part 2 of his proposed “First Principles of Alberta,” challenging the idea that government authority should flow from Ottawa down to ordinary citizens. Byfield argues for turning that system upside down, giving families and local communities greater authority over decisions and taxation. He lays out his principles for property rights, justice, government accountability and sound money, including his proposal to redirect more resources toward community-selected charitable organizations rather than government programs. He also explains why he believes Alberta needs to establish its foundational values before writing a constitution — and invites Albertans to challenge, debate and improve his ideas. 00:00 Introduction02:45 Guest comes in: Vince Byfield03:37 Recapping the first four principles05:27 Why communities should hold more authority06:59 Local policing and community control08:40 Bottom-up democracy vs. top-down government09:33 Rodney Palmer and the CBC comparison10:47 Principle 5: Property rights and stewardship12:18 Principle 6: Justice and the right to a fair trial12:18 Principle 7: Government accountability and consent14:04 Principle 8: Fiscal and monetary discipline15:33 Byfield's proposed approach to taxes and charity16:25 Gold, silver and alternatives to the debt system17:37 Why money is the final principle18:19 Are the eight principles open to change?19:40 Why Alberta needs a foundation before independence21:07 The Bible and the principles of government22:44 Can Christian principles exist without forced belief?25:12 Community choice and Sunday business closures26:40 What's next for the First Principles of Alberta?

Talk Truth 10.09.26 - Vince Byfield Part 2 | If Alberta became independent, who should control the government, the money and the laws? Vince Byfield returns for Part 2 of his proposed “First Principles of Alberta,” challenging the idea that government authority should flow from Ottawa down to ordinary citizens. Byfield argues for turning that system upside down, giving families and local communities greater authority over decisions and taxation. He lays out his principles for property rights, justice, government accountability and sound money, including his proposal to redirect more resources toward community-selected charitable organizations rather than government programs. He also explains why he believes Alberta needs to establish its foundational values before writing a constitution — and invites Albertans to challenge, debate and improve his ideas.00:00 Introduction02:45 Guest comes in: Vince Byfield03:37 Recapping the first four principles05:27 Why communities should hold more authority06:59 Local policing and community control08:40 Bottom-up democracy vs. top-down government09:33 Rodney Palmer and the CBC comparison10:47 Principle 5: Property rights and stewardship12:18 Principle 6: Justice and the right to a fair trial12:18 Principle 7: Government accountability and consent14:04 Principle 8: Fiscal and monetary discipline15:33 Byfield's proposed approach to taxes and charity16:25 Gold, silver and alternatives to the debt system17:37 Why money is the final principle18:19 Are the eight principles open to change?19:40 Why Alberta needs a foundation before independence21:07 The Bible and the principles of government22:44 Can Christian principles exist without forced belief?25:12 Community choice and Sunday business closures26:40 What's next for the First Principles of Alberta?

Talk Truth

Vince Byfield: God, Family, Freedom and the Future of Alberta

Talk Truth 10.08.26 - Vince Byfield Part 1 | The Alberta independence debate usually focuses on whether the province should leave Canada. Vince Byfield wants to ask a different question: what would Albertans actually build afterward? In Part 1, Byfield lays out his proposed “First Principles of Alberta,” arguing that foundational principles should be established before writing a constitution or designing a new political system. Drawing from the Bible, the American founding documents and historical legal codes, he begins with the sovereignty of God, individual rights and responsibilities, the authority of the family and his argument that government power should flow from the bottom up — beginning as close to the people as possible. 00:00 Introduction03:00 Guest comes in: Vince Byfield07:19 Why independence isn’t just about “leaving” Canada08:54 What’s wrong with Canada’s current constitutional deal?10:05 What America’s founding documents got right10:33 Why Alberta needs principles before a constitution11:41 What ancient Rome can teach Alberta12:42 Building laws around enduring principles13:35 Principle 1: The sovereignty of God15:00 Principle 2: The individual16:46 Rights vs. responsibilities19:04 Principle 3: Family and faith20:49 Principle 4: Authority should remain close to the people23:01 Why local communities should have more power25:55 “Battle testing” the principles27:26 Part 2 preview

Talk Truth 10.08.26 - Vince Byfield Part 1 | The Alberta independence debate usually focuses on whether the province should leave Canada. Vince Byfield wants to ask a different question: what would Albertans actually build afterward? In Part 1, Byfield lays out his proposed “First Principles of Alberta,” arguing that foundational principles should be established before writing a constitution or designing a new political system. Drawing from the Bible, the American founding documents and historical legal codes, he begins with the sovereignty of God, individual rights and responsibilities, the authority of the family and his argument that government power should flow from the bottom up — beginning as close to the people as possible.00:00 Introduction03:00 Guest comes in: Vince Byfield07:19 Why independence isn’t just about “leaving” Canada08:54 What’s wrong with Canada’s current constitutional deal?10:05 What America’s founding documents got right10:33 Why Alberta needs principles before a constitution11:41 What ancient Rome can teach Alberta12:42 Building laws around enduring principles13:35 Principle 1: The sovereignty of God15:00 Principle 2: The individual16:46 Rights vs. responsibilities19:04 Principle 3: Family and faith20:49 Principle 4: Authority should remain close to the people23:01 Why local communities should have more power25:55 “Battle testing” the principles27:26 Part 2 preview

Alberta Independence: What Kind of Country Would We Actually Build?

Talk Truth 10.07.26 - Franco Terrazzano | Canadians were told the consumer carbon tax was gone, but Canadian Taxpayers Federation federal director Franco Terrazzano says another carbon tax is still hitting businesses — and ultimately consumers. Terrazzano breaks down the industrial carbon tax, why he argues it raises costs throughout the supply chain and what it means for Canadian jobs and competitiveness. He also digs into Ottawa’s spending and debt, the more than $1 billion he says taxpayers are spending every week on federal debt interest, proposed new CRA fines and why Canadians keep watching the purchasing power of their money shrink. 00:00 Introduction01:05 Guest comes in: Franco Terrazzano01:17 Steel jobs and Canada’s industrial carbon tax02:33 The carbon tax isn’t completely gone03:52 Does it affect grocery prices?05:12 Carbon taxes and Canadian competitiveness07:05 Saskatchewan scraps its industrial carbon tax07:54 How Canadians pushed back on the consumer carbon tax08:52 Can Carney balance the budget?10:41 The Parliamentary Budget Officer’s warning10:55 More than $1 billion a week in debt interest12:43 Proposed CRA fines of $50 a day14:52 Why is your $20 only worth a burrito?16:00 Money printing and inflation18:00 Government spending and affordability25:00 Final thoughts

Talk Truth 10.07.26 - Franco Terrazzano | Canadians were told the consumer carbon tax was gone, but Canadian Taxpayers Federation federal director Franco Terrazzano says another carbon tax is still hitting businesses — and ultimately consumers. Terrazzano breaks down the industrial carbon tax, why he argues it raises costs throughout the supply chain and what it means for Canadian jobs and competitiveness. He also digs into Ottawa’s spending and debt, the more than $1 billion he says taxpayers are spending every week on federal debt interest, proposed new CRA fines and why Canadians keep watching the purchasing power of their money shrink.00:00 Introduction01:05 Guest comes in: Franco Terrazzano01:17 Steel jobs and Canada’s industrial carbon tax02:33 The carbon tax isn’t completely gone03:52 Does it affect grocery prices?05:12 Carbon taxes and Canadian competitiveness07:05 Saskatchewan scraps its industrial carbon tax07:54 How Canadians pushed back on the consumer carbon tax08:52 Can Carney balance the budget?10:41 The Parliamentary Budget Officer’s warning10:55 More than $1 billion a week in debt interest12:43 Proposed CRA fines of $50 a day14:52 Why is your $20 only worth a burrito?16:00 Money printing and inflation18:00 Government spending and affordability25:00 Final thoughts

Canada's Carbon Tax Isn't Gone. Here's Where It Went.

Talk Truth 10.06.26 - Dr. Chris Shoemaker | After more than four decades practicing medicine in Canada, Dr. Chris Shoemaker says the COVID years changed the course of his career. In his first interview on Talk Truth, Shoemaker explains the moment he began questioning the pandemic response, why he became outspoken about ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, and what happened after he publicly spoke at the trucker convoy in Ottawa. He also discusses his experience with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, the story of 17-year-old Sean Hartman and his concerns about reported vaccine injuries, cancer and fertility. 00:00 Introduction02:20 Guest comes in: Dr. Chris Shoemaker02:56 What happened when COVID began?03:26 The first thing that made him suspicious07:15 Shoemaker’s “aha moment”09:21 When the medical college became involved09:41 Speaking at the trucker convoy10:40 Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine12:38 Why Shoemaker says early treatment mattered15:21 Why are these drugs still controversial?17:15 The ivermectin court cases19:19 The story of Sean Hartman21:59 Cancer and fertility concerns22:25 The evidence Shoemaker points to26:00 What he wants Canadians to understand27:00 Final thoughts

Talk Truth 10.06.26 - Dr. Chris Shoemaker | After more than four decades practicing medicine in Canada, Dr. Chris Shoemaker says the COVID years changed the course of his career. In his first interview on Talk Truth, Shoemaker explains the moment he began questioning the pandemic response, why he became outspoken about ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, and what happened after he publicly spoke at the trucker convoy in Ottawa. He also discusses his experience with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, the story of 17-year-old Sean Hartman and his concerns about reported vaccine injuries, cancer and fertility.00:00 Introduction02:20 Guest comes in: Dr. Chris Shoemaker02:56 What happened when COVID began?03:26 The first thing that made him suspicious07:15 Shoemaker’s “aha moment”09:21 When the medical college became involved09:41 Speaking at the trucker convoy10:40 Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine12:38 Why Shoemaker says early treatment mattered15:21 Why are these drugs still controversial?17:15 The ivermectin court cases19:19 The story of Sean Hartman21:59 Cancer and fertility concerns22:25 The evidence Shoemaker points to26:00 What he wants Canadians to understand27:00 Final thoughts

He Spoke Out at the Trucker Convoy. Then the College Came After Him.

Talk Truth 10.05.26 - Leighton Grey | “Christian nationalism” has become one of the most controversial phrases in politics, but Leighton Grey argues the conversation is often missing the point. Drawing from his article The End of Liberalism and the Rise of Christian Nationalism, Grey explains what he means by a Christian Canada, why he believes the liberal establishment is losing its grip and why simply replacing politicians won’t fix the country. He makes the case that lasting change begins much closer to home — through discipleship, families, churches and communities — and argues that transformed people ultimately produce transformed institutions. 00:00 Introduction02:45 The End of Liberalism and the Rise of Christian Nationalism03:39 Guest comes in: Leighton Grey04:15 Is the liberal establishment breaking apart?05:15 What does “Christian nationalism” actually mean?07:05 Stop looking to government to change everything08:15 Grey’s vision for changing Canada09:12 Change the people before the institutions09:52 Allan on discipleship12:24 Christianity and the future of the West14:55 Why hasn’t this worked already?20:20 Changing communities from the ground up21:22 What if Canada elected a Christian government tomorrow?24:37 The root vs. the fruit25:59 Transformed people produce transformed institutions26:49 Final thoughts

Talk Truth 10.05.26 - Leighton Grey | “Christian nationalism” has become one of the most controversial phrases in politics, but Leighton Grey argues the conversation is often missing the point. Drawing from his article The End of Liberalism and the Rise of Christian Nationalism, Grey explains what he means by a Christian Canada, why he believes the liberal establishment is losing its grip and why simply replacing politicians won’t fix the country. He makes the case that lasting change begins much closer to home — through discipleship, families, churches and communities — and argues that transformed people ultimately produce transformed institutions.00:00 Introduction02:45 The End of Liberalism and the Rise of Christian Nationalism03:39 Guest comes in: Leighton Grey04:15 Is the liberal establishment breaking apart?05:15 What does “Christian nationalism” actually mean?07:05 Stop looking to government to change everything08:15 Grey’s vision for changing Canada09:12 Change the people before the institutions09:52 Allan on discipleship12:24 Christianity and the future of the West14:55 Why hasn’t this worked already?20:20 Changing communities from the ground up21:22 What if Canada elected a Christian government tomorrow?24:37 The root vs. the fruit25:59 Transformed people produce transformed institutions26:49 Final thoughts

The End of Liberalism -- Is Christian Nationalism Rising?

Talk Truth 10.02.26 - Maria Keffler | Maria Keffler is back on Talk Truth to confront one of the most frightening messages parents can hear when a child identifies as transgender: affirm the transition or risk suicide. Keffler explains why she considers that argument emotional manipulation and discusses research from Finland, Sweden and the UK that she says challenges claims surrounding transition and mental health. She also weighs in on conversion-therapy laws, social transition, schools, smartphones and social media, and walks through what she believes parents should do when a child suddenly says they are the opposite sex. 00:00 Introduction02:44 Maria Keffler introduced03:18 Guest comes in: Maria Keffler03:24 “Live daughter or dead son?”04:24 Maria calls the argument emotional manipulation07:11 Conversion-therapy laws09:49 Canada and gender policy10:29 The Finland research12:11 Sweden and long-term outcomes13:54 The Cass Review and the evidence debate15:10 What should parents do when a child says they’re transgender?16:58 Schools, smartphones and social media18:35 Can parents lose custody?20:30 Transition and suicide: Corri asks for clarity23:49 Tomboys, puberty and social influence26:42 Final thoughts

Talk Truth 10.02.26 - Maria Keffler | Maria Keffler is back on Talk Truth to confront one of the most frightening messages parents can hear when a child identifies as transgender: affirm the transition or risk suicide. Keffler explains why she considers that argument emotional manipulation and discusses research from Finland, Sweden and the UK that she says challenges claims surrounding transition and mental health. She also weighs in on conversion-therapy laws, social transition, schools, smartphones and social media, and walks through what she believes parents should do when a child suddenly says they are the opposite sex.00:00 Introduction02:44 Maria Keffler introduced03:18 Guest comes in: Maria Keffler03:24 “Live daughter or dead son?”04:24 Maria calls the argument emotional manipulation07:11 Conversion-therapy laws09:49 Canada and gender policy10:29 The Finland research12:11 Sweden and long-term outcomes13:54 The Cass Review and the evidence debate15:10 What should parents do when a child says they’re transgender?16:58 Schools, smartphones and social media18:35 Can parents lose custody?20:30 Transition and suicide: Corri asks for clarity23:49 Tomboys, puberty and social influence26:42 Final thoughts

"Would You Rather Have a Live Daughter or a Dead Son?" Maria Keffler Responds

Talk Truth 10.01.26 - Dr. Robert Malone | Dr. Robert Malone is back on Talk Truth — but this conversation goes somewhere completely different. Malone discusses Homesteading for Health: One Farm Family’s Guide to Food, Land, and Self-Sufficiency, the new book written with his wife, Dr. Jill Malone, and their decades of experience living and working on small farms. From processed food and depleted soil to regenerative farming, backyard gardens, chickens and buying meat directly from farmers, Malone explains why he believes more families are looking for greater control over where their food comes from. And for anyone who thinks homesteading requires 40 acres and a tractor, he explains how to start small — even if all you have is an apartment window. 00:00 Introduction00:55 Guest comes in: Dr. Robert Malone01:18 A very different conversation with Malone03:00 Inside Homesteading for Health05:36 Processed food and modern diets07:17 What’s happened to the soil?10:16 Regenerative farming11:45 Do you need a farm to homestead?12:29 The growing back-to-the-land movement14:28 Taking control of what you eat15:35 Homesteading from an apartment16:24 What Victory Gardens proved18:41 Why Malone recommends starting with chickens19:41 Raised beds, compost and rebuilding soil22:05 The reality of running a small farm23:16 Buying meat directly from farmers26:14 Where to find the book

Talk Truth 10.01.26 - Dr. Robert Malone | Dr. Robert Malone is back on Talk Truth — but this conversation goes somewhere completely different. Malone discusses Homesteading for Health: One Farm Family’s Guide to Food, Land, and Self-Sufficiency, the new book written with his wife, Dr. Jill Malone, and their decades of experience living and working on small farms. From processed food and depleted soil to regenerative farming, backyard gardens, chickens and buying meat directly from farmers, Malone explains why he believes more families are looking for greater control over where their food comes from. And for anyone who thinks homesteading requires 40 acres and a tractor, he explains how to start small — even if all you have is an apartment window.00:00 Introduction00:55 Guest comes in: Dr. Robert Malone01:18 A very different conversation with Malone03:00 Inside Homesteading for Health05:36 Processed food and modern diets07:17 What’s happened to the soil?10:16 Regenerative farming11:45 Do you need a farm to homestead?12:29 The growing back-to-the-land movement14:28 Taking control of what you eat15:35 Homesteading from an apartment16:24 What Victory Gardens proved18:41 Why Malone recommends starting with chickens19:41 Raised beds, compost and rebuilding soil22:05 The reality of running a small farm23:16 Buying meat directly from farmers26:14 Where to find the book

Dr. Robert Malone: You Don't Need a Farm to Start Homesteading

Talk Truth 09.30.26 - Leighton Grey | After Surrey RCMP officers showed up at Action4Canada founder Tanya Gaw’s home in connection with an investigation into material posted online, Talk Truth brought lawyer Leighton Grey back to tackle the questions Canadians are asking: What speech is protected? What could cross the line? What about private group chats? And what should you actually do if police show up at your door? Using a game of “Protected or Risky?” Corri puts a series of hypothetical statements to Grey before asking him to walk through what he says Canadians should know about answering the door, speaking to police, warrants, recording an encounter and protecting their rights. 00:00 Introduction03:12 Tanya Gaw and the RCMP investigation04:19 What are the “11 Hallmarks of Hate”?04:56 Guest comes in: Leighton Grey07:55 Protected or Risky?08:31 Criticizing an idea vs. attacking people09:50 When speech targets an entire group10:33 Blaming a group for society’s problems11:36 Dehumanizing language12:37 Criticizing political leaders13:49 When words become a threat15:04 What about private group chats?18:53 Allan’s 2012 controversy20:37 Could old posts come back years later?22:16 What if police show up at your door?22:43 Grey explains what he says your rights are25:38 Recording the encounter26:55 Final thoughts

Talk Truth 09.30.26 - Leighton Grey | After Surrey RCMP officers showed up at Action4Canada founder Tanya Gaw’s home in connection with an investigation into material posted online, Talk Truth brought lawyer Leighton Grey back to tackle the questions Canadians are asking: What speech is protected? What could cross the line? What about private group chats? And what should you actually do if police show up at your door? Using a game of “Protected or Risky?” Corri puts a series of hypothetical statements to Grey before asking him to walk through what he says Canadians should know about answering the door, speaking to police, warrants, recording an encounter and protecting their rights.00:00 Introduction03:12 Tanya Gaw and the RCMP investigation04:19 What are the “11 Hallmarks of Hate”?04:56 Guest comes in: Leighton Grey07:55 Protected or Risky?08:31 Criticizing an idea vs. attacking people09:50 When speech targets an entire group10:33 Blaming a group for society’s problems11:36 Dehumanizing language12:37 Criticizing political leaders13:49 When words become a threat15:04 What about private group chats?18:53 Allan’s 2012 controversy20:37 Could old posts come back years later?22:16 What if police show up at your door?22:43 Grey explains what he says your rights are25:38 Recording the encounter26:55 Final thoughts

Police at Your Door Over a Social Media Post? Know Your Rights

Talk Truth 09.29.26 - Shawn & Teresa Buckley | Shawn and Teresa Buckley are back on Talk Truth for the first time since the Allison Inquiry — and this time, they’re looking back at what happened, what the cameras didn’t capture and what comes next. They discuss the more than 1,400 people who applied to testify, why Teresa felt compelled to read the names of those who couldn’t take the stand, the emotional scenes behind the cameras, the significance they place on MPs hearing the testimony on Parliament Hill and Shawn’s response to critics who dismissed the event because it wasn’t a government inquiry. Shawn also gives his assessment of mainstream media’s role during COVID and explains why he believes real accountability will require investigations independent of government. 00:00 Introduction02:39 Guest comes in: Shawn & Teresa Buckley03:31 Looking back at the Allison Inquiry05:49 What witnesses experienced behind the scenes07:41 More than 1,400 people applied to testify08:40 Why Teresa read the names10:33 Ron Johnson, Peter McCullough & Rodney Palmer13:14 How this differed from the National Citizens Inquiry15:35 The significance of being on Parliament Hill16:55 “They can no longer say they don’t know”18:52 Shawn responds: “It wasn’t an official inquiry”19:55 Why he says government can’t investigate itself22:20 What Shawn believes happens next23:16 Independent media and mainstream media25:57 What comes next after the Allison Inquiry

Talk Truth 09.29.26 - Shawn & Teresa Buckley | Shawn and Teresa Buckley are back on Talk Truth for the first time since the Allison Inquiry — and this time, they’re looking back at what happened, what the cameras didn’t capture and what comes next. They discuss the more than 1,400 people who applied to testify, why Teresa felt compelled to read the names of those who couldn’t take the stand, the emotional scenes behind the cameras, the significance they place on MPs hearing the testimony on Parliament Hill and Shawn’s response to critics who dismissed the event because it wasn’t a government inquiry. Shawn also gives his assessment of mainstream media’s role during COVID and explains why he believes real accountability will require investigations independent of government.00:00 Introduction02:39 Guest comes in: Shawn & Teresa Buckley03:31 Looking back at the Allison Inquiry05:49 What witnesses experienced behind the scenes07:41 More than 1,400 people applied to testify08:40 Why Teresa read the names10:33 Ron Johnson, Peter McCullough & Rodney Palmer13:14 How this differed from the National Citizens Inquiry15:35 The significance of being on Parliament Hill16:55 “They can no longer say they don’t know”18:52 Shawn responds: “It wasn’t an official inquiry”19:55 Why he says government can’t investigate itself22:20 What Shawn believes happens next23:16 Independent media and mainstream media25:57 What comes next after the Allison Inquiry

"They Can No Longer Say They Don't Know" -- Inside the Allison Inquiry

Talk Truth 09.28.26 - Rodney Palmer | Former CBC journalist Rodney Palmer takes a deeper look at what he believes happened inside Canadian media during COVID and why public trust in the news has collapsed. Drawing on more than 20 years in Canadian newsrooms, Palmer discusses the difference between journalism and propaganda, the use of fear and emotionally charged production in COVID coverage, his attempts to connect CBC with scientists offering different perspectives, and why he believes important questions were never asked. He also describes changes he says he witnessed in Canadian newsrooms before the pandemic, what he would do if he were put in charge of CBC for one year, and the two words he believes every viewer should ask when deciding whether a news story can be trusted: “Says who?” 00:00 - Introduction01:46 - Guest comes in: Rodney Palmer02:19 - Reaction to the Allison Inquiry04:51 - What happened to fair and balanced journalism?06:26 - How could journalists let this happen?07:30 - Inside CBC editorial decisions09:43 - Palmer says he tried to bring other scientists to CBC10:26 - The use of tension music in COVID news11:19 - When Palmer says he realized something had changed14:32 - When did Canadian journalism start deteriorating?16:08 - Palmer says COVID changed everything17:24 - Was fear being sold to Canadians?18:59 - “Vaccine hesitancy” and media labels20:47 - Could trust in CBC ever be restored?21:46 - What Palmer would do if he ran CBC24:52 - Can independent media be trusted?25:13 - The two words every viewer should ask: “Says who?”26:57 - Final thoughts

Talk Truth 09.28.26 - Rodney Palmer | Former CBC journalist Rodney Palmer takes a deeper look at what he believes happened inside Canadian media during COVID and why public trust in the news has collapsed. Drawing on more than 20 years in Canadian newsrooms, Palmer discusses the difference between journalism and propaganda, the use of fear and emotionally charged production in COVID coverage, his attempts to connect CBC with scientists offering different perspectives, and why he believes important questions were never asked. He also describes changes he says he witnessed in Canadian newsrooms before the pandemic, what he would do if he were put in charge of CBC for one year, and the two words he believes every viewer should ask when deciding whether a news story can be trusted: “Says who?”00:00 - Introduction01:46 - Guest comes in: Rodney Palmer02:19 - Reaction to the Allison Inquiry04:51 - What happened to fair and balanced journalism?06:26 - How could journalists let this happen?07:30 - Inside CBC editorial decisions09:43 - Palmer says he tried to bring other scientists to CBC10:26 - The use of tension music in COVID news11:19 - When Palmer says he realized something had changed14:32 - When did Canadian journalism start deteriorating?16:08 - Palmer says COVID changed everything17:24 - Was fear being sold to Canadians?18:59 - “Vaccine hesitancy” and media labels20:47 - Could trust in CBC ever be restored?21:46 - What Palmer would do if he ran CBC24:52 - Can independent media be trusted?25:13 - The two words every viewer should ask: “Says who?”26:57 - Final thoughts

Former CBC Journalist: "They Were Selling Fear"

Talk Truth 09.25.26 - Rodney Palmer Testimony | Former CBC journalist and foreign correspondent Rodney Palmer gives his testimony at the Allison Inquiry, laying out why he believes CBC’s approach to journalism fundamentally changed during COVID. Drawing on his experience working at CBC and reporting internationally, Palmer examines specific CBC broadcasts, COVID origins coverage, messaging to children about vaccines, the handling of reported vaccine injuries and what he describes as the suppression of a veteran CBC reporter’s story. He also discusses Science Up First, the use of labels like “anti-vaxxer,” “conspiracy theorist” and “misinformation,” and the 2023 protest that covered CBC’s Toronto headquarters with the stories of people reporting vaccine injuries and deaths. Palmer argues that what he witnessed was no longer public broadcasting, but what he describes as “state broadcasting.” 00:00 - Introduction01:47 - Rodney Palmer’s testimony begins02:42 - Public broadcaster vs. state broadcaster04:35 - Palmer examines CBC’s early COVID coverage08:33 - CBC Kids and vaccine messaging11:29 - The vaccine injury story Palmer says CBC suppressed13:10 - “The collapse of journalism”13:49 - Science Up First and CBC experts15:39 - Palmer alleges conflicts weren’t disclosed17:05 - Vaccine injuries and the stories Canadians didn’t hear19:41 - Carole Pearce’s story20:29 - “Anti-vaxxer,” “conspiracy theorist” and “misinformation”21:32 - Palmer calls the language a form of censorship22:34 - Vaccine injury stories posted across CBC headquarters24:52 - Public broadcaster or state broadcaster?25:43 - Allan and Corri react

Talk Truth 09.25.26 - Rodney Palmer Testimony | Former CBC journalist and foreign correspondent Rodney Palmer gives his testimony at the Allison Inquiry, laying out why he believes CBC’s approach to journalism fundamentally changed during COVID. Drawing on his experience working at CBC and reporting internationally, Palmer examines specific CBC broadcasts, COVID origins coverage, messaging to children about vaccines, the handling of reported vaccine injuries and what he describes as the suppression of a veteran CBC reporter’s story. He also discusses Science Up First, the use of labels like “anti-vaxxer,” “conspiracy theorist” and “misinformation,” and the 2023 protest that covered CBC’s Toronto headquarters with the stories of people reporting vaccine injuries and deaths. Palmer argues that what he witnessed was no longer public broadcasting, but what he describes as “state broadcasting.”00:00 - Introduction01:47 - Rodney Palmer’s testimony begins02:42 - Public broadcaster vs. state broadcaster04:35 - Palmer examines CBC’s early COVID coverage08:33 - CBC Kids and vaccine messaging11:29 - The vaccine injury story Palmer says CBC suppressed13:10 - “The collapse of journalism”13:49 - Science Up First and CBC experts15:39 - Palmer alleges conflicts weren’t disclosed17:05 - Vaccine injuries and the stories Canadians didn’t hear19:41 - Carole Pearce’s story20:29 - “Anti-vaxxer,” “conspiracy theorist” and “misinformation”21:32 - Palmer calls the language a form of censorship22:34 - Vaccine injury stories posted across CBC headquarters24:52 - Public broadcaster or state broadcaster?25:43 - Allan and Corri react

Former CBC Journalist: "I Watched It Morph Into Propaganda"

Talk Truth 09.24.26 - Tanya Gaw | Two Surrey RCMP officers showed up at Action4Canada founder Tanya Gaw’s home after receiving a complaint about material posted on her website and X account. Gaw recorded the encounter as an officer explained that police were investigating content in relation to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code and invited her to speak with investigators after consulting legal counsel. Gaw pushed back, asked police to identify the specific posts and provide the complaint in writing, and says that three months later she still had not received the requested information. She explains why she decided to release the recording publicly and discusses her concerns about free expression, hate-speech complaints and where she believes Canada is heading. 00:00 - Introduction03:13 - Guest comes in: Tanya Gaw04:11 - RCMP show up at Tanya’s home04:58 - The doorstep recording05:29 - Section 319(2) and the complaint06:45 - Tanya asks for everything in writing07:28 - Which posts were being investigated?07:53 - The “11 Hallmarks of Hate”08:17 - Tanya reacts to the investigation11:33 - What her lawyer told her13:25 - Did RCMP ever send the requested information?16:59 - Were they really RCMP officers?18:45 - Free speech and the Canadian Anti-Hate Network20:39 - Tanya on rights, oaths and speaking out25:11 - Final thoughts

Talk Truth 09.24.26 - Tanya Gaw | Two Surrey RCMP officers showed up at Action4Canada founder Tanya Gaw’s home after receiving a complaint about material posted on her website and X account. Gaw recorded the encounter as an officer explained that police were investigating content in relation to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code and invited her to speak with investigators after consulting legal counsel. Gaw pushed back, asked police to identify the specific posts and provide the complaint in writing, and says that three months later she still had not received the requested information. She explains why she decided to release the recording publicly and discusses her concerns about free expression, hate-speech complaints and where she believes Canada is heading.00:00 - Introduction03:13 - Guest comes in: Tanya Gaw04:11 - RCMP show up at Tanya’s home04:58 - The doorstep recording05:29 - Section 319(2) and the complaint06:45 - Tanya asks for everything in writing07:28 - Which posts were being investigated?07:53 - The “11 Hallmarks of Hate”08:17 - Tanya reacts to the investigation11:33 - What her lawyer told her13:25 - Did RCMP ever send the requested information?16:59 - Were they really RCMP officers?18:45 - Free speech and the Canadian Anti-Hate Network20:39 - Tanya on rights, oaths and speaking out25:11 - Final thoughts

"You're Under Investigation": RCMP Show Up at Tanya Gaw's Home

Talk Truth 09.23.26 - Joel Malm | Pastor, author and Summit Leaders founder Joel Malm joins us to talk about recognizing God’s purpose through every season of life. Malm explains why that feeling that “there’s more in me” may point toward gifts and callings that haven’t been fully used, how difficult seasons and even failures can prepare us for what comes next, and what to do when God seems silent. He also discusses young people searching for meaning, learning to hear God’s voice, and the message behind his new book, The Circle Perspective: How Your Journey Has Prepared You for Your Higher Destiny. 00:00 - Introduction03:17 - Guest comes in: Joel Malm04:27 - Growing up in a ministry family06:30 - Wisdom, perspective and God’s purpose08:13 - “I know there’s still more in me”10:40 - A God-given stirring or just discontentment?12:39 - How do you know what God has next?13:18 - The Circle Perspective16:04 - When God seems silent16:46 - Your survival story becomes someone else’s survival manual18:40 - Were young people born for this moment?21:13 - Can failure actually prepare you?23:37 - Why Joel takes leaders on extreme expeditions25:22 - How do we hear God’s voice?26:58 - The Circle Perspective27:32 - Final thoughts

Talk Truth 09.23.26 - Joel Malm | Pastor, author and Summit Leaders founder Joel Malm joins us to talk about recognizing God’s purpose through every season of life. Malm explains why that feeling that “there’s more in me” may point toward gifts and callings that haven’t been fully used, how difficult seasons and even failures can prepare us for what comes next, and what to do when God seems silent. He also discusses young people searching for meaning, learning to hear God’s voice, and the message behind his new book, The Circle Perspective: How Your Journey Has Prepared You for Your Higher Destiny.00:00 - Introduction03:17 - Guest comes in: Joel Malm04:27 - Growing up in a ministry family06:30 - Wisdom, perspective and God’s purpose08:13 - “I know there’s still more in me”10:40 - A God-given stirring or just discontentment?12:39 - How do you know what God has next?13:18 - The Circle Perspective16:04 - When God seems silent16:46 - Your survival story becomes someone else’s survival manual18:40 - Were young people born for this moment?21:13 - Can failure actually prepare you?23:37 - Why Joel takes leaders on extreme expeditions25:22 - How do we hear God’s voice?26:58 - The Circle Perspective27:32 - Final thoughts

What If Everything You've Been Through Was Preparing You for What's Next?

Talk Truth 09.22.26 - John Carpay | What happens when a Canadian court strikes down a law but an elected government refuses to accept the result? John Carpay, president and founder of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, explains Section 33 of the Charter — the notwithstanding clause — why it was included in Canada’s Constitution and why he believes it is an important check on judicial power. Carpay discusses how Quebec, Ontario and Alberta have used the clause, its five-year limit, the debate surrounding Quebec’s Bill 21, and the broader question of who should ultimately shape Canadian law: elected legislatures or the courts. 00:00 - Introduction01:04 - Guest comes in: John Carpay02:02 - What is the notwithstanding clause?04:36 - Why Section 33 became controversial06:47 - Why Carpay says it matters now08:06 - A check on judicial power09:49 - The five-year limit10:29 - How provinces have used Section 3313:38 - What is “juristocracy”?15:56 - Why Section 33 was added to the Charter18:41 - What Section 33 cannot do19:40 - The Supreme Court and Bill 2122:30 - Where to find Carpay’s report24:48 - Psalm 24 and devotional27:01 - Living in Truth

Talk Truth 09.22.26 - John Carpay | What happens when a Canadian court strikes down a law but an elected government refuses to accept the result? John Carpay, president and founder of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, explains Section 33 of the Charter — the notwithstanding clause — why it was included in Canada’s Constitution and why he believes it is an important check on judicial power. Carpay discusses how Quebec, Ontario and Alberta have used the clause, its five-year limit, the debate surrounding Quebec’s Bill 21, and the broader question of who should ultimately shape Canadian law: elected legislatures or the courts.00:00 - Introduction01:04 - Guest comes in: John Carpay02:02 - What is the notwithstanding clause?04:36 - Why Section 33 became controversial06:47 - Why Carpay says it matters now08:06 - A check on judicial power09:49 - The five-year limit10:29 - How provinces have used Section 3313:38 - What is “juristocracy”?15:56 - Why Section 33 was added to the Charter18:41 - What Section 33 cannot do19:40 - The Supreme Court and Bill 2122:30 - Where to find Carpay’s report24:48 - Psalm 24 and devotional27:01 - Living in Truth

Who Has the Final Say in Canada -- Judges or Voters?

Talk Truth 09.21.26 - Dr. Peter McCullough Testimony Part 2 | Corri and Allan continue with Part 2 of Dr. Peter McCullough’s testimony at the Allison Inquiry. McCullough discusses persistent spike protein, the health problems he attributes to COVID vaccination, concerns he believes warrant further investigation around cancer, and the testing and treatment approaches he uses with vaccine-injured patients. He closes by calling for acknowledgment, accountability, research and treatment for those reporting vaccine injuries in Canada. 00:00 - Introduction02:19 - Dr. McCullough’s testimony continues04:16 - Persistent vaccine material and spike protein06:34 - Weighing harms and benefits07:17 - Testing the vaccine injured09:28 - Cancer concerns12:25 - Vaccine material found in tumour tissue14:04 - McCullough’s proposed treatment approach17:16 - Treating vaccine injury18:39 - Myocarditis and colchicine20:26 - Additional treatments22:41 - McCullough’s closing message23:53 - “Acknowledgment. Accountability. Research and treatment.”24:13 - Standing ovation and Allan & Corri react27:09 - Final thoughts

Talk Truth 09.21.26 - Dr. Peter McCullough Testimony Part 2 | Corri and Allan continue with Part 2 of Dr. Peter McCullough’s testimony at the Allison Inquiry. McCullough discusses persistent spike protein, the health problems he attributes to COVID vaccination, concerns he believes warrant further investigation around cancer, and the testing and treatment approaches he uses with vaccine-injured patients. He closes by calling for acknowledgment, accountability, research and treatment for those reporting vaccine injuries in Canada.00:00 - Introduction02:19 - Dr. McCullough’s testimony continues04:16 - Persistent vaccine material and spike protein06:34 - Weighing harms and benefits07:17 - Testing the vaccine injured09:28 - Cancer concerns12:25 - Vaccine material found in tumour tissue14:04 - McCullough’s proposed treatment approach17:16 - Treating vaccine injury18:39 - Myocarditis and colchicine20:26 - Additional treatments22:41 - McCullough’s closing message23:53 - “Acknowledgment. Accountability. Research and treatment.”24:13 - Standing ovation and Allan & Corri react27:09 - Final thoughts

Dr. McCullough: What Can Be Done for the COVID Vaccine Injured? | Part 2

Talk Truth is a show dedicated to thought-provoking conversations on critical, timely, and often controversial topics that impact individuals, communities, and society at large. Through engaging with a diverse range of guests, our mission is to shed light on the truth, challenge conventional narratives, and amplify voices that provide valuable information and insights. We explore the intersection of faith, society, and current events, empower individuals with knowledge, inspire meaningful and promote the pursuit of truth, accountability, and justice.

Talk Truth is a show dedicated to thought-provoking conversations on critical, timely, and often controversial topics that impact individuals, communities, and society at large. Through engaging with a diverse range of guests, our mission is to shed light on the truth, challenge conventional narratives, and amplify voices that provide valuable information and insights. We explore the intersection of faith, society, and current events, empower individuals with knowledge, inspire meaningful and promote the pursuit of truth, accountability, and justice.

hubhopper

Talk Truth

hubhopper